...claim, based on the withholding, was a claim against the United States. (4) The case fell within the well-settled principle that interest is not allowed...interest, or it is given by express statutory provision. <5) No claim for the allowance of interest could be predicated on the language of any notification,...

...based on the withholding was a claim against the United States, and the case fell within the settled principle that interest is not allowed on claims against...interest or it is given by express statutory provision. There, under the agreement for arbitration, as here, under the convention, the claim was laid before...

...based on the withholding was a claim against the United States, and the case fell within the settled principle that interest is not allowed on claims against...interest or it is given by express statutory provision. There, under the agreement for arbitration, as here, under the cpnvention, the claim was laid before...

...ready to pay. (Stephaui's Case, 1 Lawrence Dec., 35; 26 Int. Rev. Rec., 313.) It ie a well-nettled principle that interest is not allowed on claims against...interest or it is given by express statutory provision. (Angarica v. Bayard, 127 IT. S., 260; United States r. New York, 160 US, 619. See $$ 9Ü3, 966, Appendix,...

...distribution to the claimants." The petition was denied. The court held that " the case fell within the well-settled principle that interest is not allowed...interest, or it is given by express statutory provision;" and that "no clai m for the allowance of interest could be predicated on the language of any notification,...

...Code 1904, § 2462, p. 1219. 3. CLAIMS AGAINST UNITED STATES— INTEBEST. No interest is allowable on claims against the United States unless the government...interest, or it is given by express statutory provision. 4. SAME— STIPULATION — EFFECT. Under Rev. St. Г. S. §5 3753, 3754 [US Сотр. St. 1901, p....

...Healy v. Fallon" 69 Conn. 228, 235. In no case is interest allowed on claims against the government of the United States unless the government has stipulated...interest, or it is given by express statutory provision. Trigg Co. v. Bucyrus Co., 104 Va. 79, 83; citing Tillson v. US, 100 US 43 ; Angarica v. Bayard, 127...

...supposed to be always ready to pay. (Stephani's Case, 1 Lawrence Dec., 35; 26 Int. Rev. Rec., 313.) It is a well-settled principle that interest is not...interest, or it is given by express statutory provision. (Angarica v. Bayard, 127 US, 260; United States v. New York, 160 US, 619; 7 Op. Atty. Gen., 523; 9...

...supposed to be always ready to pay. (Stephani's Case, 1 Lawrence Dec'., 35; 26 Int. Rev. Rec., 313.) It is a well-settled principle that interest is not...interest, or it is given by express statutory provision. (Angaricaii. Bayard, 127 US, 260; United States v. New York, 160 US, 619; 7 Op. Atty. Gen., 523; 9...

...expressly made applicable to it, it is a well-settled rule that interest is not allowed on claimsagainst the United States, unless the government has stipulated...pay interest, or it is given by express statutory enactment.3 For the same reason a State is not liable for interest on its debts, unless its consent...